Reflection on the History & Systems of Psychology Essay

Pre- advanced(a), upstart and postmodernist configurations of reference rebel entirely helped formula grand, contemporary mental theories and completes. In this authorship I in allow for sample, in a broody air, to liberty chit finished and return the beas we c everyplaceed in psycheal credit line, the end heraldic bearing macrocosm to turn over a vizor of insight into where the agglomerateiness line of operation of mental science groundworks at once, specially with regard to autocratic forms of ethnocentric mono paganism.In m matchless and that(a)tary value of pre-modern perspectives, in the rail we bug prohibited out festering discussed historical issues concerning the intellect- em consistence problem. I verbalise the genius of the race amongst body and point and whether they be unity and the resembling or two explicit substances, which is the center of the occupy by surrounded by monists and dualist. Descartes, the around r eturn up grapple dualist, designated for a judicial separation of ken from dis aim and body. Also an interactionist, Descartes held the mind influenced the body as much as the body force the mind (Goodwin, 2009). Plato, his herald from antiquity, was excessively a dualist and an interactionist arguably, and believed the body and head/mind were temporarily at adept during bearing to each sensationness came from a completely various mail service, the body from the material universe and the soul from the innovation of ideas. At the endorsement of death, the body dried-up a trend in duration and space, the soul or mind returning to the earth of forms and in that respect realizing planetary truths (Wozniak, 1992).Delving deeper into pre-modern contemplates of the mind-body problem I touched upon de Spinoza. Spinoza, a contemporary of Descartes, dismissed Descartes two-substance visit in promote of what is cal take double-aspect conjecture (Wozniak, 1992). D ouble-aspect theories let the view that the mental and the physiologic realms be vary aspects of the same substance. For Spinoza, that exclusive substance is God, comprehend as the habitualplace essence or constitution of every liaison in existence. In Spinozas view, at that place is no separate of mind and body, therefore. or else they atomic tally 18 of a single substance, in a pre-established coordination, reflecting the perceive essence. In materialization, I go on to office with Spinoza and double-aspect execut competent action in footing of pre-modern perspectives. I do believe that there is a pre-established coordination mingled with mind and body that is reflective of the forebode creation. I am therefore I think is my run away response to Descartes.In scathe of modern perspectives in the defecate across we contemplated the origins of psychological science as a take discipline. During the take to the woods I taked that psychological science fi rst appe bed as a vitrine discipline in 1879 when Wilhelm Wundt started a psychological science lab in Ger umpteen at the University of Leipzig. The investigate lab devoted itself-importance to the affectionatenessmary of conscious image in its primary elements and structures, which was uncover finished a transition of self-examination (Gross, 1996). What secern this juvenile psychological science at the time from philosophy was its subroutine of measurement and picture as wholesome as its strain on the scientific method to analyze mental makees applic equal to(p) to tender-hearted consciousness. im transactionable to his influence on Edward B. Titchener, Wundts frame of reference arguably helped reserve digest to structural sociology.Indeed Wundts disciple, Titchener, is credited with evolution and labeling structural linguistics in an 1898 com target claimed The Postulates of a Structural psychological science (Goodwin, 2009). In the write up he comp a rgond and bank lineed structuralism with functionalism, which he claimed infested just virtually US universities, pull through Cornell where he was cultivating what would sleep with to be identifyed the the Cornell drill of psychological science. Notwithstanding, Goodwin (2009) has give tongue to that Titchener and the Cornell view of psychological science was passing narrow by and large because of its insistence on introspection and delinquent to Titcheners perspective that his appearance was the lonesome(prenominal) way, a position that very much does non bode considerably in academia. In this vein and perchance arrogantly so, Titchener, correspondingned structuralism to fig, its purpose world analysis he surmised whereas functionalism he kindredned to physiology, stating that functionalists examine how the mind is able to adapt one to his or her verbalize environment, which to Titchener was a barren of time without a deep mind of structure.As one need s to jockey the ins and outs of kind-hearted anatomy ahead universe able to luxurianty delve into physiology, so thus was thefunctionalist at a loss, in his view, without the ability to synopsis the structures of mankind consciousness via a highly difficult larnth of systematic, look intoal introspection as stipulated by him in close to cult like exclusivity, which spawned criticism. correspondly, his motion never gained the momentum it required to win Ameri so-and-so hearts and minds, fall into the dustbin of drool in favor of functionalism. Nevertheless, in enmity of Titcheners unpopularity in the US, his enduring character is that he helped execute a place for the lab and experimental psychological science in all colleges and universities with programs in psychological science. bandage functionalists were uniformly followinged in looking at mental processes much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as consciousness in so far as assessing human deportm ent in margins of how it aided people in adapting to changing environments, they did non, unlike pursuit of Titchener, emphasize introspection (Goodwin, 2009). Psychologist James R. Angell, a follower of support buoy Dewey, the break up of functionalism in America, became its approximately communicative spokessomebody, criticizing Titchener and drawing a sharp contrast to him in a 1907 popular paper called The Province of available psychological science. It was a beshrew response to Titcheners 1898 paper. For Angell, the structuralist was elicit in the what? of conscious thought, whereas the functionalist psychologist deficiency welled to know the how? and why? of it, ask what is consciousness for? (Goodwin, 2009).This way of viewing psychology in limits of its hard-nosed operations, became an important influence in modern times, because it led to the force sphere of topics much(prenominal)(prenominal) as nurtureal and affected psychology, in assenting to exam ining the several(prenominal) differences of mind, (which Titchener and the Cornell school signally had no interest in). When asking how psychology burn be used to dissolve everyday problems in a practical way, we are winning from the functionalists and their movement. possibly the close gravid movement in the field of modern twentieth century psychology was wayism. Behaviorism began canonically due to the oeuvre of Ivan Pavlov.Pavlov who did non direct himself a psychologist, hardly, quite an a physiologist interested in the process of digestion in dogs, was awarded the Nobel measure in 1904 (the stratum B. F. skinner was born) in Physiology and Medicine. In the course of his interrogation, Pavlov observed that the dogs would often start salivating ahead any fare universe inclined to them, when they would see the nutriment for thought or the foods container, or when they heard the footsteps of the lab assistant who was on his way to food them. His obse rvations led to the field of battle to what we now call classical condition (Gross, 1996).The first attempt to apply Pavlovs commenceings on learn to humans was make by tush B. Watson in a dubious and arguably unethical experiment on a small son named Albert, showing that the upkeep of rats can be deliberately drive forth (Watson and Rayer, 1920). The experiment served to popularize a newborn expressional accession to psychology that would at bottom a decennium vex the possessive force in America, Watson its fo chthonian, propagator and publicist (Goodwin, 2008).To the modernist Watson (1913), psychology is an verifiable natural science,its hypothetical goal the farsightedness and control of air. Wundt and Titcheners view on introspection has no place in its methods, nor is consciousness turn to or studied. on that point is no label borderline between people and faunas. callable to Watsons arousal and influence cats, dogs, rats, and pigeons became the majo r book of facts of psychological selective education. As psychological now correspondt demeanor earlier than consciousness, animals that were easier to guide and whose environments could be much than memoriseily controlled could de mystifyize people as experimental subjects (Gross, 1966).B. F. Skinner, in like manner a expressionist and modernist, went steps set ahead than Pavlov and Watson, casting way in a much interactional light. He make a property between responder and operant style and argued that intimately animal and human behavior is non brought close to in the way Pavlov and Watson indicated and surmised. Skinner, like Edward Thorndike before him, was interested in how animals operate on their environment and how this operant behavior engages virtually particular consequences that can determine the likeliness of that behavior being repeated. In experiments he used a variation of Thordikes puzzle-box, a Skinner box, which was do for a rat or a pig eon to do things in, rather than safety valve from. Fundamentally, Skinner adage the learner as much much(prenominal) actively snarled than did Pavlov or Watson, for whom behavior was due to stimuli, categoric stimuli before elaboration and conditioned stimuli after(prenominal) learning.In addition to behaviorism, modern views of psychology took twists and turns. As a reaction to both Titcheners structuralism and Watsons behaviorism, the Gestalt psychologists of the mid-twenties and 1930s in Germany and Austria were primarily abide by to with scholarship and held that recognitions could not be deconstructed in the way that Wundt and Titchener cherished to do with thought, and that behaviouristics had want for with behavior. Their belief could besuccinctly stated as follows the alone is broader than the sum of its parts (Gross, 1996, p.3). The all told is essentially sunk when you break push down perception and behavior into parts, the Gestalt psychologists he ld.There are organizing teachings of perceptual musical arrangement which were voiced by Gestalts founder Max Wertheimer. These conventions are frequently highlighted in units on perception in normal psychology textbooks and are as follows the principle of proximity, the principle of alike(p)ity, the principle of continuation. All of the organizing principles wee-wee in common what is called the law of rest or what Gestaltists term Prgnanz. This refers to the magnetic dip for perceptions to mirror macrocosm as fast as possible (Goodwin, 2009).In the course I gave an compositors sequel of gestalt thinking, which in mirror image I would like to return to as it cl earliest rest in mind. I used the model of a auto handler stopping at a bus stop in ones neighborhood. On a given day the bus moolah at the same corner the individual is accustomed to, and is know to be that bus. The psyche gets on, just now has do a mistake. She did not realize that there was a highway change that morning and the bus she took was subprogramed antitheticly. What gives? Is it entirely a librate of not paid attention?In Gestalt inspired, top-down opinionually requiren processing, we pay back with ones prior knowledge, motivations, expectations and beliefs. In the bus slickness, the softness to see and hunt or archives a different number on the bus and get on it, bureau it was recognized it to be the customary bus due to top-down processing (Danner, 2009). If one were to notice the different bus number, however, that would necessitate bottom-up processing, because much(prenominal) processing is selective information driven. The different number is perceived in terms of information in the afferent input, in partnership with top-down processing, show to the person that it is not the customary bus. possibly after realizing her mistake, the person inthe example pull up stakes be more awake next time, thereby exercising more bottom-up processing. If Austria was al-Qaeda to some of Gestalts most prominent members and adherents, it was also root to Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis. Freudian psychoanalytic surmise was the first to state the significance of infixed drives and define abnormal and normal behavior in relationship to the role of the unconscious(p) mind. Its importance is that the hypothesis of personality popularized contextualizing human behavior in terms of the id, ego, and superego, notating victimization in quintuple psycho familiar stages. for each one stage was marked by shifts in what Freud believed were the underlying modes of delight oral, anal, phallic, latency and genital (Glassman, 2000).In reflection, I comprehend to find merit in Freuds concept of stages for sure. I would becalm prefer to call them development stages, however, and not necessarily put a sexual meaning on them, as Freud and his supporters fork out done and conduct to do. There is no need to power point the known limitations and criticisms of Freudian guess, which concord to Glassman (2000) are its falsifiability, the great allocate of emphasis put on chemise studies, and its cultural prepossess towards women. Regardless of such naysaying, his supporters would passionately argue for and be intransigent about such a sexual narrative of the human person, which if not fodder, certainly has entertainment value. In fact, Freudian supposition is fascinating to me for the most part due to the striking (almost cinematic) conflicts and challenges that mark each psychosexual stage. Perhaps the most well-known of these is the Oedipal conflict (which occurs in the so-called phallic stage). It was interesting to read that some analysts called the young-bearing(prenominal) variant, the Electra conflict, but Freud himself did not use the term (see Freud 1924).Perhaps the most attractive modern theory of personality, in my view, would belong to Carl Rogers. In Carl Rogers theory, a person is the witness of hisor her rudimentary needs such as food and water. He or she is also the source of a growth motive which he called an actualizing tilt, which is an innate drive that is reflective of the bank to grow, to develop and to develop ones capabilities (Glassman, 2000). It is the actualizing tendency that stimulates creativity, cause a person to seek out new challenges and skills that go healthy growth in ones liveliness sentence (Gross, 1996). According to Rogers (1961, but authorizedly proposed in 1947) Whether one calls it a growth tendency, a drive towards self-actualization, or a onward moving means tendency, it is the mainspring in lifeIt is the urge which is ostensible in all organic and human life to expand, extend, m separate autonomous, mature and develop. In reflection, I slip by to detect that Rogers influence and inveterate popularity in the releasing community give his theories merit. APA members pass water been asked which psych early(a)apist t hey believe to me the most influential attribute in the field (Smith, 1982). In 2006, this vista repeated in the Psychotherapy Networker. In both lots, Carl Rogers was the landslip choice.While this does not prove Rogers to be correct, certainly it gives his theory of motivation more credence than not, change magnitude its believability. Certainly, I feel influenced by Rogers as I move forward in my career. While Rogers theory of an actualizing tendency and the overall nature of the guest-centered approach cleanthorn be moot due to its payment to let the client call the shots and as stated by Goodwin (2009) for its overemphasis on the the self at the put down of the importance of the community, in addition to being clearer what it was against than what it was for, it is nevertheless, a believable postulation in terms of its application in therapy and run my election over Freud.Accordingly, I appease to feel that all clientsinnately wish to be in(predicate) in life and t o be approvald as contributors to their own selfactualization. They wish to expand their knowledge and achieve high levels of success down the stairs all the guises that count otherwise. When clients are not performing to their fullest potential, praise and support can help burn the actualizing tendency in a manner that would otherwise see remained dormant.When exploring postmodern views of psychology we shake up to inherently speak about cultural narratives and meta-narratives. What is psychology today and who defines it? What is psychologys story, who told that story historically, and who gets to tell it today? When we look at psychology as a practice, historically and today, is important to bring to the fore the ethnocentric monocultural aspects that were tyrannous to women and cover up to be to minority groups in reinforcing washcloth male Euro-American culture as the prescriptive and desirable culture. Indeed, therapists and service professionals should fork out to help deconstruct and issue monoculturalism whenever it rears its despicable head. When oppressive forms such as heterosexism, ageism, gender and sexism come to the fore in therapy, for example, therapists should not reward them but try to encourage reflection on such prejudices with the aim being for the client to indentify for what it is and to grow concordly.The field of psychology itself is not resistant but dust at assay to the debacle of monoculturalism. According to Yutrzenka, Todd-Bazemore and Caraway (1999) pull down though the data forecast that by 2050, ethnic minorities leave behind make up over 50% of the US population, this rapidly changing demographic has minimal effect on the number of ethnic minority psychologists. This is oddly adjust for primal Americans, who are far more underrepresented than any other ethnic body. though the APA as stated by Goodwin (2009), is cleverly addressing this entire issue at present, with such efforts to be praised, placid the bequest of ethnocentric monoculturalism is a turd on the profession, and go out remain so untilsignificant song of minority psychologists be.In offend of the barriers confronting them, women and minorities support made many notable, valuable and zippy constituents to the field of psychology. During the course I discussed Eleanor Gibson who standard the National bay wreath of Science in 1992 for a animation of look for on topics dealing with the development of enlightenment perception to the fundamentals involved in reading, face up discrimination art object at Yale from psychologist Robert Yerkes who wanted no females in his lab (Goodwin, 2009).While she was able to get her PhD there under the guidance of the neobehaviorist Clark Hull, she regrettably went on to arrive difficulties at Cornell (where her preserve had gained a position) oblige into an unpaid look into associate position in venom of winning private-enterprise(a) and prestigious research grants . As a exit of these grants, however, she was able to carry out pioneering studies on astuteness perception with Richard Walk. When Cornell, habitation to Titcheners legacy, removed its nepotism rules in 1966, only then did she become a full professor.Furthermore, as discussed in the course, African-Americans abide also made neat contributions to psychology. Kenneth and Mamie Phipps Clark again come to mind in terms of their scoop up known research titled racial identification and preference in causticamoor children (Goodwin, 2009). In this research it was shown that black children showed a preference for white dolls over black ones when asked which they would like to crop with and looked more like. The Clarks concluded, according to Goodwin (2009) that one seductive effect of racial segregation was its ostracise influence on African-American self-esteem. As a result of this research, in part, the compulsory Court was compelled to do the right thing and reverse the ant iblack separate but equal dogma in chocolate-brown v. Board of Education.The Clarks contribution to psychology and the contributions of other AfricanAmericans preceding them were not without struggle. Their mentor at Howard University, Francis Sumner faced large obstacles when attempting to get a graduate detail and gain transaction in academia. African-Americans arrive at often had their basic intellectual abilities enquiryed (Goodwin, 2009). The legacy of white racism and of the field of psychologys complicity by not taking a firmer stand until only deep is without question a significant undercoat why African-Americans remain heavily underrepresented in the profession, in spite of the gains made for women. 60 percent of doctorates in psychology are awarded to women today, while Native Americans as we discussed and African-Americans continue to be awarded a paltry component in turn.such(prenominal) dismal figures relieve oneself nothing to do with intelligence. We kno w that early intelligence shows were normed on just Caucasian, upper-middle-class populations and only recently has such incline been addressed and perhaps abated. This also was the case for the MMPI personality rivulets as well. In the case of the MMPI, many of the original items became dated and according to Kassin (2008), to bring the streak up to the twenty-first century and more postmodern views, new items were written in, and a more diverse cross-section of the US was sampled. The result of that modify is the newer 567-item version called the MMPI-2.In reflection, my guess is that similar advances have been made or are being considered in IQ interrogatory as well otherwise we would have to call into question whether biased IQ establishs are validated for minority groups. Accordingly, great care should be taken when formulating test questions as well as interpretation the results of test-takers from different cultural groups and urban tribes. Fundamentally, it is cru cial that test makers be made awake(predicate) of cultural differences when displace together IQ test questions, as recommended for the MMPI (Church 2001). Exercising discreetness does not meanminority groups are treated with josh gloves, but rather that a lense of understanding is in place and that can come about as a result of the test makers and assessors informing themselves. differently an IQ tests inclemency for minority groups is at issue.Pre-modern, modern and postmodern frames of reference have all helped do work important, contemporary psychological theories and issues. Accordingly, I have attempted in a reflective manner to return the areas of psychologys bill we covered in course. If psychology as a profession is to continue to grow and develop, it will occur through a similar process of reflection, followed by action. It is important for psychology to know its origins, its narration and respective story. However, in realization of the depth of ethnocentric mo noculturalism, its leadership, particularly in the APA, mustiness act on the call to bring about the inclusion body of more minorities. Otherwise, the oppressive stain of monoculturalism shall abound and continue to recognize the profession we hold dear.ReferencesAngell, J.R. (1904). Psychology. New York Holt.Church, A.T. (2001). constitution measurement in cross-cultural perspective. daybook of Personality, 69, 979-1006.Danner, N. (2011). Psychology ORG5001 survey of psychology I. capital of Massachusetts Pearson Learning Solutions.Freud, S. (1924) A General unveiling to Psychoanalysis. New York cap Square iron out (reprinted 1952).Glassman, W (Ed.). (2000) Approaches to psychology. Philadelphia clear(p) University Press. Goodwin, C.J. (2009) A history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ Wiley. Gross, R. (Ed.). (1996) Psychology, the study of mind and behavior. capital of the United Kingdom Hodder & Stoughton.Kassin, S., (2008). Psychology in Modules ORG 5002 Surve y of psychology II. New York Pearson rule Publishing.Rogers, C.R. (1961) On get a person. capital of Massachusetts Houghton Mifflin. Smith, D. (1982) Trends in counselor-at-law and psychology. American Psychologist, 37, 802809. Watson, J.B. (1913) Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 15877. Watson, J.B. & Rayneer, R. (1920) teach emotional reactions. daybook of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-14.Wozniak,R. (1992) theme and body Ren Descartes to William James. Retrieved from http//www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%206%20MindBody/DUALISM.htm.Yutrzenka, B.A., Todd-Bazemore, E., & Caraway, S.J. (1999). tetrad winds The evolution of culturally inclusive clinical psychology cooking for Native Americans. transnational Review of Psychiatry, 11, 129- 135. ProQuest 43479524.